How It Started — A Systems Way of Thinking
I was drawn to complex systems long before I had a name for them. As a child, I was fascinated by inventors, eccentric scientists, and the idea that you could understand the world well enough to build new versions of it. Robots, machines, and imagined systems were never just gadgets to me; they were expressions of how parts interact, adapt, and create behavior together.
That curiosity eventually became formal training. I studied Industrial Engineering, with a strong focus on electrical engineering, electronics, and automation; a discipline that is less about individual components and more about how entire systems are designed, optimized, and controlled. It is a highly theoretical field, and deliberately so: it teaches you to think in abstractions, constraints, and interactions rather than isolated solutions.
I continued with advanced engineering studies and research-focused programs, deepening my work in modeling, system dynamics, and experimental design. That path ultimately led me to a PhD in Neuroscience, where I worked on one of the most complex systems we know: the brain. In many ways, this was a continuation of the same question I had been asking since childhood; how distributed systems integrate information, coordinate action, and remain stable under uncertainty.
Across this trajectory, my role was never limited to implementation. I designed and architected entire experimental and technical ecosystems: from sensing and signal acquisition, to data processing pipelines, to control logic and long-term data handling. These systems had to function end-to-end, with every layer influencing the next. You cannot approach that kind of work with a narrow or tool-driven mindset; it requires systems thinking, architectural discipline, and a willingness to design beyond standard patterns.
This way of thinking; holistic, integrative, and grounded in reality; is what ultimately shaped everything that followed.